Every industry’s got ‘em: awards set by peers that help outsiders - potential clients, for instance - separate the wheat from the chaff. And for this purpose, they can be very influential. For example, I know nothing about building, so if I were choosing a contractor to help me blow 10 years’ worth of salary on a house, I’d choose the guy with the accolades. Likewise, when you’re building the next IWantYourSSIACash.ie, you’d be wise to hire the firm that’s won the shiny trophies (or in this case, shiny spiders). And let’s face it, the awards that bill themselves as the “Online Oscars” must be pretty damn good! From the Golden Spiders site:
The annual search is on again, for the much coveted eircom Golden Spider Awards. The eircom Golden Spiders are widely regarded as the oscars of the internet industry and were established exactly this day 10 years ago - to reward excellence in design, functionality, creativity and innovation in Ireland’s internet industry.
So What’s the Problem?
The problem with the “Online Oscars” mirrors that of the Oscars held each February in Hollywood: allegations are rife that “the judges are either hugely biased, utterly incompetent or the whole thing is a total fix”. Those are the words of Ken Stanley, who I think has cause to feel more than a little aggrieved. Ken submitted his site, HuntForProperty.ie, to the “Best New Website Launched in 2006″ category, only to find out that his two main competitors (Daft.ie and MyHome.ie) have no less than three judges on the panel! For the price of €100, Ken got to see his competitors snub his site and nominate themselves for two awards each! I told a few friends outside the industry of this and they laughed out loud. One said “how Irish”!
The Nominees
Not only was Ken’s site passed for the shortlist, but those that did make it can only be described as amongst some of the most amateur and poorly executed sites on the web today. They display a complete lack of competence in the firms that created them. To think that these sites are the Fruit of the Web in the year 2006 is heart-breaking; but to know they come from Ireland is as surprising as the verdict in the trial of Saddam Hussein. I’d like to review a handful of the sites from the category Ken entered to dispel the myth that they exhibit “excellence in design, functionality, creativity and innovation”. Richard Hearne has already reviewed the sites from the point of view of standards compliance, so I won’t repeat that here. His in-depth reports make for interesting, but depressing, reading.
Affordable Homes Partnership
The Affordable Homes Partnership is a state agency established in August 2005. Its main aim is to drive and co-ordinate the delivery of affordable housing in the Greater Dublin Area, with particular reference to the Dublin Metropolitan Area.
This is a large site and does a reasonable job at managing the great amount of content it holds (although most of what it holds are PDF documents). Its information architecture is designed logically; the home page is heading in the right direction in terms of partitioning the incoming traffic (Local Authorities, Construction Sector, Affordable Homes & You). But it suffers from one major problem that ruins the otherwise straight-forward composition: it’s illegible. If it had been tested on a non-Windows setup, its developers would have noticed that the font, Tahoma, that they used for all of the site’s content, does not (by default) exist on non-Windows platforms! This means that on my Mac machine, for example, I’m left looking at the default Times font, which doesn’t render well at such small sizes. I have 20/20 vision and it’s difficult to read. Our visually impaired friends can forget about it.
ExamSupport
ExamSupport sells Video Learning Packs for Leaving and Junior Cert students.
This site’s got a cluttered and awkward design; it’s got that in common with most of the others on the shortlist (at least the judges are consistent!). There is so much going on on the homepage, I don’t know where to look. And neither will most of their visitors. ExamSupport need to decide on their primary objective for new visitors to their site and stick with that. The context of most elements on this site is all over the place. It looks like someone loaded a shotgun with divs and fired it at my screen. For example, why is the “Shopping Cart” link (a functional page for the user) given the same context (position, weighting, style, behaviour) as the “Pop-up Blockers” link (an informative page, relatively low on the priority ladder)?
HomeWise.ie
HomeWise.ie offers the largest most comprehensive online directory and information centre on Home Improvements in Ireland.
Cluttered, awkward, confused; and familiar for these reasons. Again, HomeWise.ie need to set their primary goal for their homepage. I’m presuming they’d like you to search for a supplier, if you’re a consumer, or sign-up to their site, if you’re a supplier. The problem is, they’re also trying to cash in on on-site adverts, push featured products and about two dozen other things too! I appreciate their business model includes these features, but if they’re primarily a services search engine, they should focus on that first. I guarantee that if they held back on their supplementary features untill a visitor is within their site, they’d do a lot more business. I’m talking at least a 20% increase on supplier searches and the same for sign-ups. And I’d put money on that.
Onlinetradesmen.com
Onlinetradesmen.com - the stress free way to find accredited and available trade professionals nationwide. Simply tell us about your project and let us do the leg work for you.
(Quote re-typed from the homepage; they’ve got it in an image!)
Onlinetradesmen.com is the most unprofessional looking of the bunch; this site is the quintessence of poor Irish web design. But I feel bad for saying that because I get the impression it may actually be an amateur job and I really don’t want to knock their efforts. Their business idea is a good one, and I hope it’s working. (If someone from Onlinetradesmen.com reads this, please get in touch and I’ll give you some free advice on how to get your site up-to-scratch.)
The site is just so textual! It hurts my eyes and must send a great fraction of its visitors packing within seconds. Onlinetradesmen.com need to cut the clutter and explain themselves in no more than two lines. Then they need to segment their visitors into the groups relevant to their service, get them the minimum amount of information they need, and call them to action.
SellItYourself.ie
SellItYourself.ie is an Irish property website putting property buyers and property sellers in direct contact.
Again with the clutter and complexity. There is far too much going on on this homepage. Honestly, the amount of stress and mental strain these sites are putting their visitors under is unbelievable. In addition to the advice I’ve given above, SellItYourself.ie need to kick the ugly colour-scheme, give the site some space to breath (whitespace), re-align their layout (grids, anyone?) and sort out their brown-on-brown text in the “Property Search” element (probably the most important feature on the site).
I’d also like to say a little about Ken’s site; the site that didn’t make it.
HuntForProperty.ie
Hunt For Property.ie offers an unparalleled advertising opportunity for estate agents to showcase their current property portfolio.
This site has been designed with such care and passion, I want to give its creators a hug and buy them a pint. It’s not exactly to my particular design taste (although I like it more every time I visit it) and I think the text is too small, but when the industry calls (from the lips of Glenda Gilson) for mediocrity (and awards it too, for feck’s sake!), it takes a lot to keep going when a site “will do”. I know for a fact that if this site was put alongside those above and in front of an impartial and qualified panel, it would at the very least, make the shortlist.
The Next Ten Years
It’s not likely the Golden Spiders will suffer the death I’d like them to any time soon. As long as the industry is led by those who’d rather make a quick buck than a good site, there is no room for change on the horizon. Even if some new, modern-thinking leaders emerge, they’re unlikely to be favoured by the big-money sponsors who’ve too long been in bed with the big-money leaders to wake-up and get-out.
But whether the suits of our industry like it or not, things are changing outside of the Golden Spider, 1990s mindset. The demand for Web Standards is rearing its head in this country; I’ve been hired by one of the Spider-nominated design agencies to train up their guys and I’m pleasantly shocked! The demand for modern web design standards is also heating up here; more and more clients are talking about “that Web 2.0 look”.
So for my part, the best I can do is ignore the Golden Spiders, keep pushing the quality of my work and enjoy my niche. For my brothers (and sisters) in disgust, you do the same too. Forget the eircoms and find the cool clients that’ll appreciate your work. Set the design of the sites in the shortlist as the enemy of the quality work you do. It’ll pay-off in the long run, I promise. Together we’ll move the industry in this country forward and a little more in line with the rest of the world. And for the suits? Enjoy the piss-up.






15 Comments
I agree with a lot of your opinions there Eoghan - the reporting so far on the spiders shortlist (from a myriad of sources) has shown the judging to be just as shoddy as the majority of the sites shortlisted!
While you’re on the topic though, the design of this site bugs me a bit. I like the general layout and the size of the text, and the fact that it loads quickly.
However the white text on red background at the top just makes me want to scroll past the top section really quickly! I find the thin white text difficult to read (I pointed out during my talk at BarCamp that I have a lot of issues reading white text on strong backgrounds), it seems to blur and smudge when I look at it - perhaps it’s linked to my short-sightedness and astigmatism? I’ve come back here a few times and my personal reaction is growing stronger each time…
I think it might look better with a dividing white line between the two columns - it would better delineate that the two columns are about 2 different topics…
I also like the tool tips that appear when you float over the entries in those columns, by why do they only appear on some of the entries?
Anyhoo, all of the above is only IMHO, your site probably works well for the majority of users and it’s impossible to suit everyone as you probably know well!! ;-)
Oh yeah, and as a P.S. - I know my own site and blog are nothing much to look at, but I’m not a web designer!! My website was an attempt to teach myself HTML (not very successful - I can’t even get my text to line up right!) and my blog is stuck on a modified blogger template as I can’t get it to port over to wordpress!
Thanks for your comments Elly. :)
Hmmm… this entry doesn’t validate - missing the tags!
;)
A quick count gives me at least three sponsors who are also nominated…
Agree with you totally on the property site, http://www.huntforproperty.ie/ is pretty slick.
my html got robbed - meant to say you were missing your ‘rant’ tags
Stewart! I never use that tag. Not valid XHTML and you know that! ;)
Seriously though. If they’ve got the stunning Glenda Gilson dressed up like Little Miss Muffet then you can’t really expect much more. Brian O’Driscoll doesn’t really know how good he has it. Lucky ‘tarf git.
Hi Eoghan, thanks for the comments. Always interesting to get feedback. I think however you may be missing a salient point - the golden spiders are not just about design but also reward innovation, creativity etc in Ireland. From your profile I can understand why you would hone in on the design aspect but there are other criteria as well.
John, thanks for your comment. That point’s not lost on me. In fact, I mentioned that I think you business idea is a solid one, so I guess that’s why you’re there. I’d have no problem if indeed they described themselves as web business innovation awards. My gripe is that three of their four criteria are “excellence in design, functionality [and] creativity”. I’m saying I don’t think the sites meet these.
I agree that innovation, being one of the criteria, should be taken into account. However, as Eoghan said, excellence in design, functionality, creativity and technology are all criteria too and these have almost all been overlooked in favour of mediocre-poor websites that have a slightly different twist. Not exactly becoming of an industry standard award ceremony.
With respect, Johne@onlinetradesmen.com, whoever designed and coded your site cannot call themselves a professional Web designer/developer.
love the banner ken!
Pipe down Stu, you’ll wake the baby.
As I said over here (http://tcal.net/archives/2006/11/23/hunt-for-propertyie/) already…
Hunt for property just looks like he took the best features from Daft.ie, some of Myhomes layout along with the pricing structure page from Let.ie mashed them up together giving a good dose of web2.0 and then colourised.
All and all a poor attempt at an ‘original’ website.
I’m not suprised it didn’t make it past the nomination stage..
John, what makes you think they were trying to make an “original” site? Daft.ie, MyHome.ie, etc. work. Why re-invent the wheel? It would be a bad move to try and do so.
In fairness John, you’re all over the place there. The site isn’t trying to be original. There are only so many ways you can develop a property portal. Any innovation will come down the road as the site matures - it only went live in July.
Stealing some of MyHome’s layout? You have to be kidding me. Without getting bitchy, it’s really not a site that I, or the designer of Hunt For Property, like a whole lot from a design perspective. Giving it a dose of Web 2.0? I don’t even know what that means… unless you mean the little AJAX that was used?
Saying that it’s a poor attempt at an original website, I would agree. But it’s not attempting to be an original website. Not yet anyway.
There have been loads of defensive comments on various sites about Hunt For Property not deserving to be shortlisted because it’s not original enough from, I suspect, the same person. Innovation is ONE of the criteria. Hunt For Property fails from an originality perspective and does better on ALL OTHER criteria. All of the shortlisted sites do average-well on originality and most fail miserably on most other criteria. Do the mathematics. Besides, I think a re-hashed, unoriginal idea that has made some effort at standards and accessibility deserves more commendation than an original idea that’s built irresponsibly with a blatant disregard for best practice.
Rant over.
One Trackback/Pingback
[…] Or am I kidding myself thinking the Golden Spiders have anything to do with art? Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. […]